Skip to main content

Firewall Rules Coexistence

Overview​

Modern enterprise environments often deploy Zero Trust micro-segmentation to secure internal workloads and enforce least-privilege access. However, these environments also include systems and tools—such as Docker—that dynamically program their own firewall rules. This document outlines best practices for maintaining Zero Trust policy integrity using the Xshield platform, while allowing necessary exceptions for systems like Docker.

Importance of Full Policy Ownership in Zero Trust​

Xshield implements Zero Trust through application-aware micro-segmentation, requiring full ownership of enforcement points. This ensures:

  • Deterministic Behavior: Only explicitly allowed traffic is permitted.
  • Centralized Visibility: Security teams have full traceability of all traffic flows and rules.
  • Consistent Enforcement: Unmanaged or conflicting firewall rules do not interfere with the Zero Trust posture.

Without full control, unauthorized communication paths may be introduced, weakening the overall security posture and violating Zero Trust principles.

Common Conflict Scenario: Docker Firewall Rules​

Tools such as Docker automatically manage networking for containers by injecting their own iptables rules. These rules can conflict with Xshield-managed policies in the following ways:

  • Docker rules may have higher priority, overriding Xshield rules.
  • Rules applied to Docker bridge networks may allow overly broad traffic.
  • Lack of visibility from Xshield into container-level traffic flows.

To ensure Docker functionality without compromising Zero Trust enforcement, follow the structured exception model using Xshield’s capabilities.

1. Define Layered Policies​

Use Xshield’s policy grouping and tagging features to separate system-level rules (e.g., Docker exceptions) from core Zero Trust policies. This helps maintain visibility and auditability.

2. Explicit Process-Based Exceptions​

Leverage Xshield’s support for process-level visibility to allow only necessary Docker services. For example:

  • Allow outbound traffic from dockerd or containerd processes only.
  • Permit traffic over Docker's virtual bridge (docker0) interface selectively.

3. Scoped Network Rules​

Create tightly scoped network policies:

  • IP/Port Filtering: Permit specific container communication flows (e.g., container-to-container on specific ports).
  • Interface Binding: Bind exceptions to Docker’s bridge network to avoid affecting other interfaces.

4. Continuous Monitoring and Audit​

Use Xshield’s real-time traffic visibility to monitor all flows, including those allowed via exceptions:

  • Flag and investigate unexpected or unauthorized traffic.
  • Periodically review and clean up temporary or legacy exceptions.

5. Fail-Safe Defaults​

Ensure that all exception handling defaults to deny if misconfigured. For example, if Docker’s rule injection fails or conflicts arise, Xshield policies should continue to enforce secure defaults.

Summary​

The Xshield provides a robust platform for Zero Trust micro-segmentation with process-level control and visibility. While full firewall ownership is critical to maintaining Zero Trust, real-world environments may require exceptions for system tools like Docker. By structuring these exceptions carefully—using scoped rules, policy layering, and real-time monitoring—organizations can maintain strong security postures without sacrificing operational flexibility.